Medicare Part D Creditable Coverage: The 72% Test Is About to Be Mandatory
The Part D out-of-pocket cap moved to $2,100 for 2026, and the test for whether your plan counts as creditable got stricter. Steven Hinton on what to confirm before the October 15 notices go out, and why your employees over 65 will care.
Every October, employers send a notice to Medicare-eligible employees saying whether the prescription drug coverage on the group plan is creditable, meaning at least as good as standard Part D. For years that notice was a formality. It is not anymore.
What changed
The Inflation Reduction Act capped Part D out-of-pocket costs at $2,000 in 2025, and that cap is $2,100 for 2026. Standard Part D got a lot more generous, which means the bar for an employer plan to be "as good as" Part D got higher.
CMS responded by revising its simplified determination method. Under the old simplified test, a plan was creditable if it was expected to pay at least 60% of participants' prescription drug costs. The revised test raises that to 72%. For 2026, CMS let plans use either method. For 2027, the revised method is expected to be the only one, and the threshold may move again.
Why employees care
If your plan is not creditable and a Medicare-eligible employee stays on it instead of enrolling in Part D, they pay a late enrollment penalty for the rest of their life once they do enroll. That penalty is 1% of the national base premium for every month they went without creditable coverage. Your 66-year-old controller who delayed Part D because the group plan was supposedly creditable will not be happy to find out it was not.
What to do before October 15
Ask your carrier or PBM for a written creditable coverage determination for 2026 under the revised method, not just the old one, so you know where the plan stands going into 2027. High-deductible plans and plans with high pharmacy coinsurance are the ones most likely to fail. If the plan is not creditable, the notice has to say so clearly, and I would also send a plain-language note to anyone 65 or older explaining what that means for their Part D decision.
Then get the notice out by October 15, keep a copy, and do not forget the online disclosure to CMS within 60 days of the start of the next plan year, which is March 1 for a calendar-year plan.
Looking ahead
If your plan fails the 72% test, the fix is usually a modest change to the pharmacy benefit for the following year: lower the deductible on prescriptions or improve the coinsurance tier. That costs something. But it is cheaper than the alternative, which is a separate Medicare-coordinated option for your older employees, and both are better than a notice that says "not creditable" to a group of people you would like to keep.
This is general guidance, not legal advice. If you have not seen a creditable coverage determination for your plan this year, ask for one, or ask us to.
This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute insurance, legal, tax, or financial advice. For guidance specific to your organization, talk with an FBP advisor.
Want this applied to your plan?
Our advisors turn insights like these into a concrete strategy for your workforce. Start with a free benchmark analysis.
Related insights
ACA Affordability Crosses 10% for 2027. Here Is What That Does to Your Contribution Strategy.
The affordability threshold moves to 10.22% in 2027, the first time it has crossed 10%. Andrew Smith walks through the new safe harbor numbers, the higher penalties, and the mistake that gets employers in trouble every year.
Read article ComplianceThe 2027 Out-of-Pocket Maximum Jumped 13%. Do Not Let Your Plan Design Quietly Follow It.
The ACA cost-sharing cap moves to $12,000 self-only and $24,000 family in 2027, the largest one-year increase in the program. Andrew Smith on why the cap rose, the embedded-limit rule, and the difference between what is legal and what is wise.
Read article ComplianceMental Health Parity Did Not Go Away. The DOL Just Told Us Where It Is Looking.
The 2024 parity rule is being rewritten, but the statute and the comparative analysis requirement are still in force, and a new Labor Department bulletin lists three enforcement priorities. Doug Foreman on what a plan sponsor should have on file.
Read article